name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Somalia

country_id: SO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Spain

country_id: ES

ns: wb

description: Population in urban agglomerations of more than one million is the percentage of a country's population living in metropolitan areas that in 2018 had a population of more than one million people.

key: id

type: original

key: Developmentrelevance

value:
According to the United Nations, an Urban Agglomeration refers to the de facto population contained within the contours of a contiguous territory inhabited at urban density levels without regard to administrative boundaries. It usually incorporates the population in a city or town plus that in the sub-urban areas lying outside of but being adjacent to the city boundaries. In general, an urban agglomeration is an extended city or town area comprising the built-up area of a central place and any suburbs linked by continuous urban area. INSEE, the French Statistical Institute, uses the term unité urbaine, which means continuous urbanized area. There are differences in definitions of what does and does not constitute an "agglomeration", as well as differenced in statistical and geographical methodology. Some of the well-known urban agglomerations of the world are Tokyo, New York City, Mexico City, New Delhi, and Seoul.

A metropolitan area includes the urban area, and its satellite cities plus intervening rural land that is socio-economically connected to the urban core city, typically by employment ties through commuting, with the urban core city being the primary labor market. According to the United Nations' definition, a metropolitan area includes both the contiguous territory inhabited at urban levels of residential density and additional surrounding areas of lower settlement density that are also under the direct influence of the city (e.g., through frequent transport, road linkages, commuting facilities etc.).

Explosive growth of cities globally signifies the demographic transition from rural to urban, and is associated with shifts from an agriculture-based economy to mass industry, technology, and service. For the first time ever, the majority of the world's population lives in a city, and this proportion continues to grow. One hundred years ago, 2 out of every 10 people lived in an urban area. By 1990, less than 40 percent of the global population lived in a city, but as of early 2010s, more than half of all people live in an urban area. By 2030, 6 out of every 10 people will live in a city, and by 2050, this proportion will increase to 7 out of 10 people. About half of all urban dwellers live in cities with between 100,000-500,000 people, and fewer than 10% of urban dwellers live in megacities (a city with a population of more than 10 million, as defined by UN HABITAT). Currently, the number of urban residents is growing by nearly 60 million every year.

By the middle of the 21st century, the urban population will almost double, reaching 6.4 billion in 2050. Almost all urban population growth in the next 30 years will occur in cities of developing countries. By the middle of the 21st century, it is estimated that the urban population of developing counties will more than double, reaching almost 5.2 billion in 2050. In high-income countries, the urban population is expected to remain largely unchanged over the next two decades, reaching to just over 1 billion by 2025. In these countries, immigration (legal and illegal) will account for more than two-thirds of urban growth. Without immigration, the urban population in these countries would most likely decline or remain static.

In principle, cities offer a more favorable setting for the resolution of social and environmental problems than rural areas. Cities generate jobs and income, and deliver education, health care and other services. Cities also present opportunities for social mobilization and women's empowerment. Poverty is growing faster in urban than in rural areas. According to UN one billion people live in urban slums, which are typically overcrowded, polluted and dangerous, and lack basic services such as clean water and sanitation.

key: IndicatorName

key: Limitationsandexceptions

value:
Due to varying definitions, it is not possible to compare different agglomerations around the world.

Aggregation of urban and rural population may not add up to total population because of different country coverage. There is no consistent and universally accepted standard for distinguishing urban from rural areas, in part because of the wide variety of situations across countries.

 Most countries use an urban classification related to the size or characteristics of settlements. Some define urban areas based on the presence of certain infrastructure and services. And other countries designate urban areas based on administrative arrangements. Because of national differences in the characteristics that distinguish urban from rural areas, the distinction between urban and rural population is not amenable to a single definition that would be applicable to all countries. For example, in Botswana, agglomeration of 5,000 or more inhabitants where 75 per cent of the economic activity is non-agricultural is considered "urban" while in Iceland localities of 200 or more inhabitants, and in Peru population centers with 100 or more dwellings, are considered "urban." In the United States places of 2,500 or more inhabitants, generally having population densities of 1,000 persons per square mile or more are considered "urban".

Estimates of the world's urban population would change significantly if China, India, and a few other populous nations were to change their definition of urban centers. According to China's State Statistical Bureau, by the end of 1996 urban residents accounted for about 43 percent of China's population, more than double the 20 percent considered urban in 1994. In addition to the continuous migration of people from rural to urban areas, one of the main reasons for this shift was the rapid growth in the hundreds of towns reclassified as cities in recent years.

Because the estimates of city and metropolitan area are based on national definitions of what constitutes a city or metropolitan area, cross-country comparisons should be made with caution. To estimate urban populations, UN ratios of urban to total population were applied to the World Bank's estimates of total population.

key: Longdefinition

key: Periodicity

value: Annual

key: Source

value: United Nations, World Urbanization Prospects.

key: Statisticalconceptandmethodology

value:
Urban population refers to people living in urban areas as defined by national statistical offices. The indicator is calculated using World Bank population estimates and urban ratios from the United Nations World Urbanization Prospects. The United Nations Population Division and other agencies provide current population estimates for developing countries that lack recent census data and pre- and post-census estimates for countries with census data. The cohort component method - a standard method for estimating and projecting population - requires fertility, mortality, and net migration data, often collected from sample surveys, which can be small or limited in coverage. Population estimates are from demographic modeling and so are susceptible to biases and errors from shortcomings in the model and in the data. Because the five-year age group is the cohort unit and five-year period data are used, interpolations to obtain annual data or single age structure may not reflect actual events or age composition.

Countries differ in the way they classify population as "urban" or "rural." Typically, a community or settlement with a population of 2,000 or more is considered urban, but national definitions are most commonly based on size of locality. Eurostat defines urban areas as clusters of contiguous grid cells of 1 km2 with a density of at least 300 inhabitants per km2 and a minimum population of 5,000. Further it defines high-density cluster as contiguous grid cells of 1 km2 with a density of at least 1,500 inhabitants per km2 and a minimum population of 50,000.

The population of a city or metropolitan area depends on the boundaries chosen. For example, in 1990 Beijing, China, contained 2.3 million people in 87 square kilometers of "inner city" and 5.4 million in 158 square kilometers of "core city." The population of "inner city and inner suburban districts" was 6.3 million and that of "inner city, inner and outer suburban districts, and inner and outer counties" was 10.8 million. (Most countries use the last definition.)

key: Topic

value: Environment: Density & urbanization

key: Aggregationmethod

value: Weighted average

value: CC BY-4.0

value: Population in urban agglomerations of more than one million is the percentage of a country's population living in metropolitan areas that in 2000 had a population of more than one million people.

key: Shortdefinition

ftype: VARCHAR

description: A unique identifier for the indicator being reported.

description: The name or title of the indicator providing a human-readable label.

description: A unique identifier code for the country associated with the indicator.

description: The full name of the country relevant to the indicator data.

sem_type: encountryname

description: The ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 code—a three-letter country code standard—for the country.

date

description: The date or year the indicator measurement or observation pertains to.

sem_type: year

value

description: The numerical or measured value of the indicator for the given country and date.

unit

description: The unit of measurement in which the indicator value is expressed.

description: The observation status indicating any special conditions or qualifiers about the data value.

decimal

ftype: BIGINT

description: The number of decimal places to which the indicator value is reported or rounded.

schema: wb


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Tanzania

country_id: TZ

value: Population in urban agglomerations of more than one million is the percentage of a country's population living in metropolitan areas that in 2018 had a population of more than one million people.


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Thailand

country_id: TH


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Uruguay

country_id: UY


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Vanuatu

country_id: VU


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Africa Western and Central

country_id: ZI


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Arab World


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Central Europe and the Baltics


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - IBRD only

country_id: XF


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - IDA & IBRD total

country_id: ZT


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - IDA total

country_id: XG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Antigua and Barbuda

country_id: AG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Brazil

country_id: BR


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Burkina Faso

country_id: BF


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Cabo Verde

country_id: CV


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Canada

country_id: CA


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Cote d'Ivoire

country_id: CI


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Cuba

country_id: CU


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Ecuador

country_id: EC


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Eritrea

country_id: ER


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Georgia

country_id: GE


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Ghana

country_id: GH


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Grenada

country_id: GD


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Isle of Man

country_id: IM


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Jordan

country_id: JO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Kenya

country_id: KE


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Maldives

country_id: MV


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Marshall Islands

country_id: MH


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Moldova

country_id: MD


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Mongolia

country_id: MN


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - New Zealand

country_id: NZ


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Nigeria

country_id: NG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Portugal

country_id: PT


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Serbia

country_id: RS


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Solomon Islands

country_id: SB


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - St. Martin (French part)

country_id: MF


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Switzerland

country_id: CH


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Venezuela, RB

country_id: VE


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Caribbean small states


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Euro area

country_id: XC


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - High income

country_id: XD


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - IDA blend

country_id: XH


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Late-demographic dividend


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Middle East & North Africa

country_id: ZQ


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Not classified

country_id: XY


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Other small states


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Pre-demographic dividend


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Sub-Saharan Africa

country_id: ZG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - American Samoa

country_id: AS


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Azerbaijan

country_id: AZ


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Bahamas, The

country_id: BS


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Belgium

country_id: BE


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Belize

country_id: BZ


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Bulgaria

country_id: BG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Cayman Islands

country_id: KY


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Germany

country_id: DE


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Greenland

country_id: GL


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Guyana

country_id: GY


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Japan

country_id: JP


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Kuwait

country_id: KW


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Lesotho

country_id: LS


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Macao SAR, China

country_id: MO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Madagascar

country_id: MG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Malta

country_id: MT


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Mauritius

country_id: MU


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Morocco

country_id: MA


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Myanmar

country_id: MM


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - New Caledonia

country_id: NC


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Oman

country_id: OM


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Palau

country_id: PW


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Puerto Rico

country_id: PR


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Saudi Arabia

country_id: SA


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - South Africa

country_id: ZA


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Tajikistan

country_id: TJ


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Turkmenistan

country_id: TM


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - United Arab Emirates

country_id: AE


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Virgin Islands (U.S.)

country_id: VI


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Africa Eastern and Southern

country_id: ZH


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - European Union

country_id: EU


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Least developed countries: UN classification

country_id: XL


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Low & middle income

country_id: XO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Middle East & North Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - South Asia (IDA & IBRD)


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

country_id: ZF


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Algeria

country_id: DZ


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Andorra

country_id: AD


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Angola

country_id: AO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Australia

country_id: AU


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Barbados

country_id: BB


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Bolivia

country_id: BO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Brunei Darussalam

country_id: BN


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Congo, Dem. Rep.

country_id: CD


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Costa Rica

country_id: CR


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Cyprus

country_id: CY


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Dominica

country_id: DM


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Egypt, Arab Rep.

country_id: EG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - El Salvador

country_id: SV


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Ethiopia

country_id: ET


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Kyrgyz Republic

country_id: KG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Latvia

country_id: LV


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Lebanon

country_id: LB


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Malaysia

country_id: MY


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Montenegro

country_id: ME


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Namibia


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Norway

country_id: NO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Pakistan

country_id: PK


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Papua New Guinea

country_id: PG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Philippines

country_id: PH


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Qatar

country_id: QA


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Romania

country_id: RO


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Samoa

country_id: WS


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Slovak Republic

country_id: SK


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Slovenia

country_id: SI


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - South Sudan

country_id: SS


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Turks and Caicos Islands

country_id: TC


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Tuvalu

country_id: TV


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Uganda

country_id: UG


name: Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population) - Uzbekistan

country_id: UZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Los Angeles

country_id: US

description: The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.

value: Efficient contract enforcement is essential to economic development and sustained growth. Economic and social progress cannot be achieved without respect for the rule of law and effective protection of rights, both of which require a well-functioning judiciary that resolves cases in a reasonable time and is predictable and accessible to the public. Economies with a more efficient judiciary, in which courts can effectively enforce contractual obligations, have more developed credit markets and a higher level of development overall. A stronger judiciary is also associated with more rapid growth of small firms. Overall, enhancing the efficiency of the judicial system can improve the business climate, foster innovation, attract foreign direct investment and secure tax revenues.

value: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB17-20 methodology)

value: The Doing Business methodology has five limitations that should be considered when interpreting the data. First, for most economies the collected data refer to businesses in the largest business city and may not be representative of regulation in other parts of the economy. Second, the data often focus on a specific business form—generally a limited liability company (or its legal equivalent) of a specified size—and may not be representative of the regulation on other businesses. Third, transactions described in a standardized case scenario refer to a specific set of issues and may not represent the full set of issues that a business encounters. Fourth, the measures of time involve an element of judgment by the expert respondents. When sources indicate different estimates, the time indicators reported in Doing Business represent the median values of several responses given under the assumptions of the standardized case. Finally, the methodology assumes that a business has full information on what is required and does not waste time when completing procedures. In practice, completing a procedure may take longer if the business lacks information or is unable to follow up promptly. Alternatively, the business may choose to disregard some burdensome procedures. For both reasons the time delays reported in Doing Business would differ from the recollection of entrepreneurs reported in the World Bank Group Enterprise questionnaires or other firm-level questionnaires.

key: Referenceperiod

value: Data are presented for the survey year instead of publication year.

value: World Bank Group, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).

value:
Data are collected by the World Bank Group with a standardized questionnaire that uses a simple business case to ensure comparability across economies and over time—with assumptions about the legal form of the business, its size, its location and nature of its operation. Questionnaires are administered to more than 13,800 local experts, including lawyers, business consultants, accountants, freight forwarders, government officials and other professionals routinely administering or advising on legal and regulatory requirements.

The Doing Business data are based on a detailed reading of domestic laws, regulations and administrative requirements as well as their implementation in practice as experienced by private firms. The report covers 190 economies—including some of the smallest and poorest economies, for which little or no data are available from other sources. The data are collected through several rounds of communication with expert respondents (both private sector practitioners and government officials), through responses to questionnaires, conference calls, written correspondence and visits by the team. Doing Business relies on four main sources of information: the relevant laws and regulations, Doing Business respondents, the governments of the economies covered and the World Bank Group regional staff.

value: Enforcing contracts


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Rio de Janeiro

country_id: BR

value: The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Tokyo

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Angola

country_id: AO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Bhutan

country_id: BT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Botswana

country_id: BW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Comoros

country_id: KM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Dominican Republic

country_id: DO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Grenada

country_id: GD


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Liberia

country_id: LR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Malaysia

country_id: MY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mexico

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Nepal

country_id: NP


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Niger

country_id: NE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Nigeria

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Palau

country_id: PW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Papua New Guinea

country_id: PG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Romania

country_id: RO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Singapore

country_id: SG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Solomon Islands

country_id: SB


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Somalia

country_id: SO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Vanuatu

country_id: VU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - West Bank and Gaza

country_id: PS


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Zambia

country_id: ZM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Kano


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Monterrey


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Shanghai

country_id: CN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Argentina

country_id: AR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Azerbaijan

country_id: AZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Bahamas, The

country_id: BS


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Belize

country_id: BZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Bolivia

country_id: BO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Bosnia and Herzegovina

country_id: BA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Cameroon

country_id: CM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Central African Republic

country_id: CF


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Congo, Rep.

country_id: CG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Denmark

country_id: DK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Georgia

country_id: GE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Guyana

country_id: GY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Haiti

country_id: HT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Indonesia

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Kenya

country_id: KE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Latvia

country_id: LV


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Luxembourg

country_id: LU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Madagascar

country_id: MG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Malawi

country_id: MW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - North Macedonia

country_id: MK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Paraguay

country_id: PY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Russian Federation

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Slovak Republic

country_id: SK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - South Sudan

country_id: SS


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - St. Kitts and Nevis

country_id: KN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Sweden

country_id: SE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Syrian Arab Republic

country_id: SY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Timor-Leste

country_id: TL


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Tonga

country_id: TO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Karachi

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Afghanistan

country_id: AF


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Albania

country_id: AL


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Antigua and Barbuda

country_id: AG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Belgium

country_id: BE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Burundi

country_id: BI


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Costa Rica

country_id: CR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Côte d'Ivoire

country_id: CI


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Ecuador

country_id: EC


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Equatorial Guinea

country_id: GQ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Eswatini

country_id: SZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - France

country_id: FR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Ghana

country_id: GH


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Iceland

country_id: IS


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Iran, Islamic Rep.

country_id: IR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Lesotho

country_id: LS


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Marshall Islands

country_id: MH


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mongolia

country_id: MN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - New Zealand

country_id: NZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Nicaragua

country_id: NI


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Pakistan

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Puerto Rico

country_id: PR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Saudi Arabia

country_id: SA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Senegal

country_id: SN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - St. Lucia

country_id: LC


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - United Arab Emirates

country_id: AE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Jakarta

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Moscow

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mumbai

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Sao Paulo

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Algeria

country_id: DZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Bahrain

country_id: BH


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Burkina Faso

country_id: BF


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Cyprus

country_id: CY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Greece

country_id: GR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Guinea

country_id: GN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Israel

country_id: IL


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Korea, Rep.

country_id: KR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Kyrgyz Republic

country_id: KG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Libya

country_id: LY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Micronesia, Fed. Sts.

country_id: FM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Peru

country_id: PE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Philippines

country_id: PH


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Poland

country_id: PL


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - São Tomé and Principe

country_id: ST


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Seychelles

country_id: SC


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Thailand

country_id: TH


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Tunisia

country_id: TN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Uzbekistan

country_id: UZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Delhi

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Lahore

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Austria

country_id: AT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Benin

country_id: BJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Brazil

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Brunei Darussalam

country_id: BN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Canada

country_id: CA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Croatia

country_id: HR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Czech Republic

country_id: CZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Ethiopia

country_id: ET


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - India


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Iraq

country_id: IQ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Italy

country_id: IT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Japan

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Kuwait

country_id: KW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Lao PDR

country_id: LA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Liechtenstein

country_id: LI


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Maldives

country_id: MV


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mauritania

country_id: MR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Moldova

country_id: MD


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Montenegro

country_id: ME


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Morocco

country_id: MA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mozambique

country_id: MZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Norway

country_id: NO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Panama

country_id: PA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - San Marino

country_id: SM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Sierra Leone

country_id: SL


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Sri Lanka

country_id: LK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - St. Vincent and the Grenadines

country_id: VC


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Sudan

country_id: SD


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Switzerland

country_id: CH


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Taiwan, China

country_id: TW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Tanzania

country_id: TZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Turkey

country_id: TR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Uruguay

country_id: UY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Dhaka

country_id: BD


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Lagos

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - New York

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Australia

country_id: AU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Chile

country_id: CL


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Djibouti

country_id: DJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - El Salvador

country_id: SV


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Eritrea

country_id: ER


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Estonia

country_id: EE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Fiji

country_id: FJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Guinea-Bissau

country_id: GW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Jamaica

country_id: JM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Lebanon

country_id: LB


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Myanmar

country_id: MM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Portugal

country_id: PT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Rwanda

country_id: RW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Samoa

country_id: WS


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Slovenia

country_id: SI


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - South Africa

country_id: ZA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Togo

country_id: TG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Trinidad and Tobago

country_id: TT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Ukraine

country_id: UA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Zimbabwe

country_id: ZW


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Beijing

country_id: CN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mexico City

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Surabaya

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Armenia

country_id: AM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Cambodia

country_id: KH


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Chad

country_id: TD


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - China


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Colombia

country_id: CO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Congo, Dem. Rep.

country_id: CD


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Egypt, Arab Rep.

country_id: EG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Finland

country_id: FI


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Gambia, The

country_id: GM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Guatemala

country_id: GT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Hong Kong, China

country_id: HK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Hungary

country_id: HU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Ireland

country_id: IE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Jordan

country_id: JO


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Kazakhstan

country_id: KZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Kiribati

country_id: KI


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Kosovo

country_id: XK


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mali

country_id: ML


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Namibia


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Netherlands

country_id: NL


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Qatar

country_id: QA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Spain

country_id: ES


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Tajikistan

country_id: TJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - United States

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Venezuela, RB

country_id: VE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Yemen, Rep.

country_id: YE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Chittagong

country_id: BD


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Osaka

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - St. Petersburg

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Bangladesh


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Barbados

country_id: BB


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Belarus

country_id: BY


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Bulgaria

country_id: BG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Cabo Verde

country_id: CV


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Dominica

country_id: DM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Gabon

country_id: GA


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Germany

country_id: DE


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Honduras

country_id: HN


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Lithuania

country_id: LT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Malta

country_id: MT


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Mauritius

country_id: MU


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Oman

country_id: OM


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Serbia

country_id: RS


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Suriname

country_id: SR


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Uganda

country_id: UG


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - United Kingdom

country_id: GB


name: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology) - Vietnam

country_id: VN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Lagos

country_id: NG

description: The attorney fees are the fees that plaintiff must advance to a local attorney in the standardized case, regardless of final reimbursement.

value: Attorney fees (% of claim)


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Lahore

country_id: PK

value: The attorney fees are the fees that plaintiff must advance to a local attorney in the standardized case, regardless of final reimbursement.

value: Annual


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Los Angeles

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Monterrey

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Australia

country_id: AU


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Bhutan

country_id: BT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Central African Republic

country_id: CF


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Georgia

country_id: GE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Guyana

country_id: GY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Indonesia

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Iran, Islamic Rep.

country_id: IR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Korea, Rep.

country_id: KR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Kyrgyz Republic

country_id: KG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Latvia

country_id: LV


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mauritius

country_id: MU


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Niger

country_id: NE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Panama

country_id: PA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - São Tomé and Principe

country_id: ST


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Serbia

country_id: RS


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Spain

country_id: ES


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Sri Lanka

country_id: LK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Suriname

country_id: SR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Venezuela, RB

country_id: VE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - West Bank and Gaza

country_id: PS


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Beijing

country_id: CN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mumbai

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Afghanistan

country_id: AF


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Antigua and Barbuda

country_id: AG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Bahrain

country_id: BH


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Benin

country_id: BJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - China


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Ethiopia

country_id: ET


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Ghana

country_id: GH


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Greece

country_id: GR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Haiti

country_id: HT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Hungary

country_id: HU


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Iraq

country_id: IQ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Madagascar

country_id: MG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Nepal

country_id: NP


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - New Zealand

country_id: NZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Romania

country_id: RO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Senegal

country_id: SN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Sierra Leone

country_id: SL


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Slovak Republic

country_id: SK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Somalia

country_id: SO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Togo

country_id: TG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Uganda

country_id: UG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Ukraine

country_id: UA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - United Kingdom

country_id: GB


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Uruguay

country_id: UY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Chittagong

country_id: BD


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Moscow

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Bangladesh


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Cambodia

country_id: KH


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Chile

country_id: CL


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Dominican Republic

country_id: DO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Equatorial Guinea

country_id: GQ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Finland

country_id: FI


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Iceland

country_id: IS


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Luxembourg

country_id: LU


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Paraguay

country_id: PY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Rwanda

country_id: RW


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - South Africa

country_id: ZA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Switzerland

country_id: CH


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Vanuatu

country_id: VU


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mexico City

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Osaka

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Surabaya

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Belarus

country_id: BY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Belgium

country_id: BE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Brazil

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Bulgaria

country_id: BG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Burundi

country_id: BI


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Costa Rica

country_id: CR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Czech Republic

country_id: CZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Denmark

country_id: DK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Eswatini

country_id: SZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Kenya

country_id: KE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mali

country_id: ML


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Malta

country_id: MT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Marshall Islands

country_id: MH


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Moldova

country_id: MD


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Morocco

country_id: MA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Netherlands

country_id: NL


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - North Macedonia

country_id: MK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Oman

country_id: OM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Poland

country_id: PL


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Portugal

country_id: PT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - St. Lucia

country_id: LC


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Dhaka

country_id: BD


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Jakarta

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Karachi

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - New York

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Rio de Janeiro

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Shanghai

country_id: CN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Barbados

country_id: BB


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Botswana

country_id: BW


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Colombia

country_id: CO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Djibouti

country_id: DJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - El Salvador

country_id: SV


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Eritrea

country_id: ER


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Estonia

country_id: EE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Fiji

country_id: FJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - France

country_id: FR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Germany

country_id: DE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Guinea-Bissau

country_id: GW


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Israel

country_id: IL


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Italy

country_id: IT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Kazakhstan

country_id: KZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Kiribati

country_id: KI


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Kosovo

country_id: XK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Lao PDR

country_id: LA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Lesotho

country_id: LS


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Liberia

country_id: LR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Libya

country_id: LY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Lithuania

country_id: LT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Maldives

country_id: MV


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Myanmar

country_id: MM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Nigeria

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Pakistan

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Palau

country_id: PW


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Samoa

country_id: WS


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - South Sudan

country_id: SS


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - St. Kitts and Nevis

country_id: KN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Timor-Leste

country_id: TL


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Albania

country_id: AL


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Austria

country_id: AT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Belize

country_id: BZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Burkina Faso

country_id: BF


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Cabo Verde

country_id: CV


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Cameroon

country_id: CM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Canada

country_id: CA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Cyprus

country_id: CY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Ecuador

country_id: EC


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Gambia, The

country_id: GM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Guatemala

country_id: GT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Hong Kong, China

country_id: HK


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Ireland

country_id: IE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Japan

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Jordan

country_id: JO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mauritania

country_id: MR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Micronesia, Fed. Sts.

country_id: FM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mongolia

country_id: MN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Papua New Guinea

country_id: PG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Peru

country_id: PE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Philippines

country_id: PH


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Qatar

country_id: QA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Russian Federation

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - San Marino

country_id: SM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Singapore

country_id: SG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Solomon Islands

country_id: SB


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - St. Vincent and the Grenadines

country_id: VC


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Sudan

country_id: SD


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Syrian Arab Republic

country_id: SY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Taiwan, China

country_id: TW


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Turkey

country_id: TR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - United States

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Vietnam

country_id: VN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Yemen, Rep.

country_id: YE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Delhi

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Kano

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - St. Petersburg


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Tokyo

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Algeria

country_id: DZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Argentina

country_id: AR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Armenia

country_id: AM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Bosnia and Herzegovina

country_id: BA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Chad

country_id: TD


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Comoros

country_id: KM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Congo, Dem. Rep.

country_id: CD


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Congo, Rep.

country_id: CG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - India


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Kuwait

country_id: KW


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Lebanon

country_id: LB


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mozambique

country_id: MZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Namibia


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Puerto Rico

country_id: PR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Tajikistan

country_id: TJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Trinidad and Tobago

country_id: TT


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Tunisia

country_id: TN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Uzbekistan

country_id: UZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Sao Paulo

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Angola

country_id: AO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Azerbaijan

country_id: AZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Bahamas, The

country_id: BS


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Bolivia

country_id: BO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Brunei Darussalam

country_id: BN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Côte d'Ivoire

country_id: CI


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Croatia

country_id: HR


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Dominica

country_id: DM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Egypt, Arab Rep.

country_id: EG


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Gabon

country_id: GA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Grenada

country_id: GD


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Guinea

country_id: GN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Honduras

country_id: HN


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Jamaica

country_id: JM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Liechtenstein

country_id: LI


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Malawi

country_id: MW


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Malaysia

country_id: MY


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Mexico

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Montenegro

country_id: ME


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Nicaragua

country_id: NI


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Norway

country_id: NO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Saudi Arabia

country_id: SA


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Seychelles

country_id: SC


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Slovenia

country_id: SI


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Sweden

country_id: SE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Tanzania

country_id: TZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Thailand

country_id: TH


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Tonga

country_id: TO


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - United Arab Emirates

country_id: AE


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Zambia

country_id: ZM


name: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim) - Zimbabwe

country_id: ZW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Beijing

country_id: CN

description: The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.

value: Score-Cost (% of claim)


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Chittagong

country_id: BD

value: The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Kano

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Los Angeles

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mumbai

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - St. Petersburg

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Surabaya

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Angola

country_id: AO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Argentina

country_id: AR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Armenia

country_id: AM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Azerbaijan

country_id: AZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Bangladesh


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Benin

country_id: BJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - China


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Egypt, Arab Rep.

country_id: EG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Eritrea

country_id: ER


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Eswatini

country_id: SZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Ethiopia

country_id: ET


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Germany

country_id: DE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Guinea

country_id: GN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Guinea-Bissau

country_id: GW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Haiti

country_id: HT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Italy

country_id: IT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Japan

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Maldives

country_id: MV


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mauritania

country_id: MR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mongolia

country_id: MN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Singapore

country_id: SG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Sri Lanka

country_id: LK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Delhi

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Dhaka

country_id: BD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Lahore

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Monterrey

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Barbados

country_id: BB


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Burkina Faso

country_id: BF


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Canada

country_id: CA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Chad

country_id: TD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Congo, Dem. Rep.

country_id: CD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Costa Rica

country_id: CR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - El Salvador

country_id: SV


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Gabon

country_id: GA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Georgia

country_id: GE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Hong Kong, China

country_id: HK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Hungary

country_id: HU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - India


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Kuwait

country_id: KW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Malta

country_id: MT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Marshall Islands

country_id: MH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Nepal

country_id: NP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Norway

country_id: NO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Qatar

country_id: QA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - São Tomé and Principe

country_id: ST


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Senegal

country_id: SN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Trinidad and Tobago

country_id: TT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Tunisia

country_id: TN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - United Kingdom

country_id: GB


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - United States

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Karachi

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Albania

country_id: AL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Australia

country_id: AU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Belarus

country_id: BY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Bhutan

country_id: BT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Brazil

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Cambodia

country_id: KH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Colombia

country_id: CO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Cyprus

country_id: CY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Kazakhstan

country_id: KZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Kyrgyz Republic

country_id: KG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mauritius

country_id: MU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Micronesia, Fed. Sts.

country_id: FM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Moldova

country_id: MD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Pakistan


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Paraguay

country_id: PY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Peru

country_id: PE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - St. Vincent and the Grenadines

country_id: VC


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Suriname

country_id: SR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mexico City

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Osaka

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Rio de Janeiro


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Antigua and Barbuda

country_id: AG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Austria

country_id: AT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Belize

country_id: BZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Bolivia

country_id: BO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Bosnia and Herzegovina

country_id: BA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Brunei Darussalam

country_id: BN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Cabo Verde

country_id: CV


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Cameroon

country_id: CM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Chile

country_id: CL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Djibouti

country_id: DJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Gambia, The

country_id: GM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Kiribati

country_id: KI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Luxembourg

country_id: LU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Malaysia

country_id: MY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Montenegro

country_id: ME


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Niger

country_id: NE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Nigeria

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Serbia

country_id: RS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Seychelles

country_id: SC


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Sierra Leone

country_id: SL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - St. Lucia

country_id: LC


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Sudan

country_id: SD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Togo

country_id: TG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Turkey

country_id: TR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Vanuatu

country_id: VU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Vietnam

country_id: VN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - West Bank and Gaza

country_id: PS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Yemen, Rep.

country_id: YE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Zambia

country_id: ZM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Lagos


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Algeria

country_id: DZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Bahrain

country_id: BH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Bulgaria

country_id: BG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Ecuador

country_id: EC


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Equatorial Guinea

country_id: GQ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Guatemala

country_id: GT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Guyana

country_id: GY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Honduras

country_id: HN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Ireland

country_id: IE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Israel

country_id: IL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Jordan

country_id: JO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Korea, Rep.

country_id: KR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Latvia

country_id: LV


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Libya

country_id: LY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Liechtenstein

country_id: LI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Madagascar

country_id: MG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mali

country_id: ML


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Myanmar

country_id: MM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Namibia


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Nicaragua

country_id: NI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Samoa

country_id: WS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - South Sudan

country_id: SS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - St. Kitts and Nevis

country_id: KN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Switzerland

country_id: CH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Syrian Arab Republic

country_id: SY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Taiwan, China

country_id: TW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Tonga

country_id: TO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Venezuela, RB

country_id: VE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Zimbabwe

country_id: ZW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - New York

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Sao Paulo

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Botswana

country_id: BW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Côte d'Ivoire

country_id: CI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Czech Republic

country_id: CZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Denmark

country_id: DK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Dominican Republic

country_id: DO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Greece

country_id: GR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Grenada

country_id: GD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Kosovo

country_id: XK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Lesotho

country_id: LS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Lithuania

country_id: LT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - North Macedonia

country_id: MK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Papua New Guinea

country_id: PG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - San Marino

country_id: SM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Slovenia

country_id: SI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Solomon Islands

country_id: SB


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Spain

country_id: ES


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Sweden

country_id: SE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Uganda

country_id: UG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Uruguay

country_id: UY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Jakarta

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Tokyo

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Afghanistan

country_id: AF


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Bahamas, The

country_id: BS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Burundi

country_id: BI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Central African Republic

country_id: CF


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Congo, Rep.

country_id: CG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Croatia

country_id: HR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Dominica

country_id: DM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Estonia

country_id: EE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Finland

country_id: FI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - France

country_id: FR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Jamaica

country_id: JM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Kenya

country_id: KE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Lao PDR

country_id: LA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Liberia

country_id: LR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Morocco

country_id: MA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Oman

country_id: OM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Panama

country_id: PA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Philippines

country_id: PH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Portugal

country_id: PT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Puerto Rico

country_id: PR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Romania

country_id: RO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Russian Federation

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Rwanda

country_id: RW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Moscow


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Shanghai

country_id: CN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Belgium

country_id: BE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Comoros

country_id: KM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Fiji

country_id: FJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Ghana

country_id: GH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Iceland

country_id: IS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Indonesia

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Iran, Islamic Rep.

country_id: IR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Iraq

country_id: IQ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Lebanon

country_id: LB


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Malawi

country_id: MW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mexico

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Mozambique

country_id: MZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Netherlands

country_id: NL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - New Zealand

country_id: NZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Palau

country_id: PW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Poland

country_id: PL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Saudi Arabia

country_id: SA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Slovak Republic

country_id: SK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Somalia

country_id: SO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - South Africa

country_id: ZA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Tajikistan

country_id: TJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Tanzania

country_id: TZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Thailand

country_id: TH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Timor-Leste

country_id: TL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Ukraine

country_id: UA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - United Arab Emirates

country_id: AE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score - Uzbekistan

country_id: UZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Beijing

country_id: CN

description: The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.

value: Cost (% of claim)


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Dhaka

country_id: BD

value: The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Karachi

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Osaka

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Algeria

country_id: DZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Armenia

country_id: AM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Belize

country_id: BZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Benin

country_id: BJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Central African Republic

country_id: CF


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Chad

country_id: TD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - China


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Cyprus

country_id: CY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Dominica

country_id: DM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Ethiopia

country_id: ET


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Ghana

country_id: GH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Grenada

country_id: GD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Guatemala

country_id: GT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Kenya

country_id: KE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Madagascar

country_id: MG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Maldives

country_id: MV


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Mali

country_id: ML


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Nepal

country_id: NP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - New Zealand

country_id: NZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Nicaragua

country_id: NI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Pakistan

country_id: PK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - São Tomé and Principe

country_id: ST


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - South Sudan

country_id: SS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Suriname

country_id: SR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Tajikistan

country_id: TJ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Ukraine

country_id: UA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Uzbekistan

country_id: UZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Delhi

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Lahore


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Rio de Janeiro

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Angola

country_id: AO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Antigua and Barbuda

country_id: AG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Argentina

country_id: AR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Bhutan

country_id: BT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Guinea

country_id: GN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Hungary

country_id: HU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - India


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Jordan

country_id: JO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Kazakhstan

country_id: KZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Kuwait

country_id: KW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Mauritania

country_id: MR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Mexico

country_id: MX


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Portugal

country_id: PT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Puerto Rico

country_id: PR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - San Marino

country_id: SM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Slovak Republic

country_id: SK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Slovenia

country_id: SI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Sri Lanka

country_id: LK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - St. Lucia

country_id: LC


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - United Kingdom

country_id: GB


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Zambia

country_id: ZM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Mexico City


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Mumbai

country_id: IN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - St. Petersburg

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Surabaya

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Tokyo

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Bolivia

country_id: BO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Bulgaria

country_id: BG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Cambodia

country_id: KH


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Congo, Rep.

country_id: CG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - El Salvador

country_id: SV


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Gabon

country_id: GA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Germany

country_id: DE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Greece

country_id: GR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Hong Kong, China

country_id: HK


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Iceland

country_id: IS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Ireland

country_id: IE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Lebanon

country_id: LB


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Luxembourg

country_id: LU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Malawi

country_id: MW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Mongolia

country_id: MN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Nigeria

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Qatar

country_id: QA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Romania

country_id: RO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Senegal

country_id: SN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Serbia

country_id: RS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Syrian Arab Republic

country_id: SY


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Uganda

country_id: UG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Zimbabwe

country_id: ZW


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Jakarta

country_id: ID


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Los Angeles

country_id: US


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Sao Paulo

country_id: BR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Bosnia and Herzegovina

country_id: BA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Burkina Faso

country_id: BF


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Colombia

country_id: CO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Equatorial Guinea

country_id: GQ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - France

country_id: FR


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Italy

country_id: IT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Japan

country_id: JP


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Malta

country_id: MT


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Norway

country_id: NO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Poland

country_id: PL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Russian Federation

country_id: RU


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Singapore

country_id: SG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Somalia

country_id: SO


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - South Africa

country_id: ZA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Togo

country_id: TG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Yemen, Rep.

country_id: YE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Chittagong

country_id: BD


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Lagos

country_id: NG


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Afghanistan

country_id: AF


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Albania

country_id: AL


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Azerbaijan

country_id: AZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Bangladesh


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Barbados

country_id: BB


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Burundi

country_id: BI


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Cabo Verde

country_id: CV


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Cameroon

country_id: CM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Canada

country_id: CA


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Comoros

country_id: KM


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Czech Republic

country_id: CZ


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Ecuador

country_id: EC


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Estonia

country_id: EE


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Honduras

country_id: HN


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Lesotho

country_id: LS


name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Liberia

country_id: LR