Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-24 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-24 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female

Share of the population of the stated age group that has never attended school. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/

Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-24 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-24 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-24 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female

Share of the population of the stated age group that has pre-primary education or incomplete primary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-24 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-24 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female

Share of the population of the stated age group that has completed primary education or incomplete lower secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female

Share of the population of the stated age group that has completed lower secondary or incomplete upper secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female

Share of the population of the stated age group that has completed upper secondary or incomplete post-secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female

Share of the population of the stated age group that has completed post-secondary or tertiary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-39 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 20-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25-29 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 25+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 40-64 by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 60+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the population age 80+ by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Percentage of the total population by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 0-19. Female

Mean number of years spent in school by age group and gender. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 0-19. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 0-19. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 15-19. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 15-19. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 15-19. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 15+. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean Years of Schooling. Age 15+. Gender Gap

The difference between male and female mean number of years spent in school by age group. It is calculated by subtracting the female value from the male value. Data can be negative if the mean years of schooling for females is higher than for males. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 15+. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 15+. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-24. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-24. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-24. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-39. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-39. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-39. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-64. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-64. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 20-64. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 25-29. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 25-29. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 25-29. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 25+. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean Years of Schooling. Age 25+. Gender Gap


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 25+. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 25+. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 40-64. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 40-64. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 40-64. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 60+. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 60+. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 60+. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 65+. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 65+. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 65+. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 80+. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 80+. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Mean years of schooling. Age 80+. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female

Total population in thousands in the specified age group that has completed primary education or incomplete lower secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female

Total population in thousands in the specified age group that has completed lower secondary or incomplete upper secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female

Total population in thousands in the specified age group that has completed upper secondary or incomplete post-secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female

Total population in thousands in the specified age group that has completed post-secondary or tertiary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female

Total population in thousands in the specified age group that has never attended school. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female

Total population in thousands in the specified age group that has pre-primary education or incomplete primary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 15-19 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 20-24 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population age 25-29 in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Female

Total population in thousands that has completed primary education or incomplete lower secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Primary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Female

Total population in thousands that has completed lower secondary or incomplete upper secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Lower Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Female

Total population in thousands that has completed upper secondary or incomplete post-secondary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Upper Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Female

Total population in thousands that has completed post-secondary or tertiary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Post Secondary. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Female

Total population in thousands that has never attended school. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. No Education. Total


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Female

Total population in thousands that has pre-primary education or incomplete primary education as the highest level of educational attainment. Projections are based on collected census and survey data for the base year (around 2010) and the Medium Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP2) projection model. The SSP2 is a middle-of-the-road scenario that combines medium fertility with medium mortality, medium migration, and the Global Education Trend (GET) education scenario. For more information and other projection models, consult the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital's website: http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/dataexplorer/


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Male


Wittgenstein Projection: Population in thousands by highest level of educational attainment. Incomplete Primary. Total


Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.


Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)

The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit; (ii) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (iii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iv) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (v) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial (0-2); and (vi) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology)

The ease of shareholder suits index measures how likely plaintiffs are to access internal corporate evidence and recover legal expenses. It has six components: (i) whether shareholders owning 10% of the company’s share capital have the right to inspect the Buyer-Seller transaction documents before filing a suit. Alternatively, whether they can request that a government inspector investigate the Buyer-Seller transaction without filing a suit; (ii) what range of documents is available to the shareholder plaintiff from the defendant and witnesses during trial; (iii) whether the plaintiff can obtain categories of relevant documents from the defendant without identifying each document specifically; (iv) whether the plaintiff can directly examine the defendant and witnesses during trial; (v) whether the standard of proof for civil suits is lower than that for criminal cases; and (vi) whether shareholder plaintiffs can recover their legal expenses from the company. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Ease of shareholder suits index (0-10) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

The score for ease of shareholder suits index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10)

The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology)

The extent of corporate transparency index measures the level of information that companies must share regarding their board members, senior executives, annual meetings and audits. This index has seven components: (i) whether Buyer must disclose direct and indirect beneficial ownership stakes representing 5%; (ii) whether Buyer must disclose information about board members’ primary employment and directorships in other companies; (iii) whether Buyer must disclose the compensation of individual managers; (iv) whether a detailed notice of general meeting must be sent 21 calendar days before the meeting; (v) whether shareholders representing 5% of Buyer’s share capital can put items on the general meeting agenda; (vi) whether Buyer’s annual financial statements must be audited by an external auditor; (vii) whether Buyer must disclose its audit reports to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of corporate transparency index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

The score for extent of corporate transparency index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score

The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10) - Score

The score for extent of disclosure index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology)

The extent of ownership and control index measures the rules governing the structure and change in control of companies. This index has seven components: (i) whether the same individual cannot be appointed CEO and chairperson of the board of directors; (ii) whether the board of directors must include independent nonexecutive board members; (iii) whether shareholder can remove members of the board of directors without cause before the end of their term; (iv) whether the board of directors must have an audit committee; (v) whether a potential acquirer must make a tender offer to all shareholders upon acquiring 50% of Buyer; (vi) whether Buyer must pay declared dividends within a maximum period set by law; (vii) whether a subsidiary cannot acquire shares issued by its parent company. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of ownership and control index (0-7) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

The score for extent of ownership and control index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)

The extent of shareholder rights index measures the role of shareholders in key corporate decisions. It has six components: (i) whether the sale of 51% of Buyer’s assets requires shareholder approval; (ii) whether shareholders representing 10% of Buyer’s share capital have the right to call for a meeting of shareholders; (iii) whether Buyer must obtain its shareholders’ approval every time it issues new shares; (iv) whether shareholders automatically receive preemption rights when Buyer issues new shares; (v) whether shareholders elect and dismiss the external auditor; (vi) whether changes to the rights of a class of shares are only possible if the holders of the affected shares approve. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of shareholder rights index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

The score for extent of shareholder rights index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10)

The extent of director liability index measures when board members can be held liable for harm caused by related-party transactions and what sanctions are available. It has seven components: (i) whether shareholders can sue directly or derivatively for the damage the transaction causes to the company; (ii) whether a shareholder plaintiff can hold Mr. James liable for the damage the Buyer-Seller transaction causes to the company; (iii) whether a shareholder plaintiff can hold other executives and directors (the CEO, members of the board of directors or members of the supervisory board) liable for the damage the transaction causes to the company; (iv) whether Mr. James pays damages for the harm caused to the company upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; (v) whether Mr. James repays profits made from the transaction upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; (vi) whether Mr. James is disqualified upon a successful claim by the shareholder plaintiff; and (vii) whether a court can void the transaction upon a successful claim by a shareholder plaintiff.


Rank: Protecting minority investors (1=most business-friendly regulations)

The ranking of economies on the strength of minority shareholder protections is determined by sorting their scores for protecting minority investors.


Protecting minority investors: Strength of investor protection index (0-10) (DB06-14 methodology)

The strength of investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index and ease of shareholder suits index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.


Protecting minority investors: Strength of minority investor protection index (0-50) (DB15-20 methodology)

The strength of minority investor protection index is the sum of the extent of disclosure index, extent of director liability index, ease of shareholder suits index, extent of shareholder rights index, extent of ownership and control index and extent of corporate transparency index. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.


PDI-1 Country with operational national development strategies (rating)

Country's national development strategy is linked to medium-term expenditure framework and reflected in annual budgets.  The degree to which governments take the lead in co-ordinating aid-funded activities is the subject of a specific commitment in the Paris Declaration.  It is also a variable that seems to be subject to significant changes over time. Another dimension of ownership is the degree to which countries have development strategies that are clear and well operationalised, so that development efforts are effective and there is a robust basis for the alignment of aid with country policies. This is based on the World Bank's Results-Based National Development Strategies: Assessment and Challenges Ahead Report.  Categorical where "A" assigned a value of 1; "B" assigned a value of 2; "C" assigned a value of 3; "D" assigned a value of 4; "E" assigned a value of 5; and "N/A" assigned a value of 6.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/monitoring).


PDI-10a Donor missions co-ordinated (percent)

Encourage shared analysis on field missions work including diagnostic reviews that are joint.  Donor co-ordinated missions focuses only on the proportion of (i) missions undertaken jointly by two or more donors, or (ii) missions undertaken by one donor on behalf of another (delegated co-operation).  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


PDI-10b Country-analysis co-ordinated (percent)

Encourage shared analysis on country analytic work including diagnostic reviews that are joint.  (i) Country analytic work undertaken by one or more donors jointly; (ii) Country analytic work undertaken by one donor on behalf of another donor (including work undertaken by one and/or used by another when it is co-financed and formally acknowledged in official documentation); (iii) Country analytic work undertaken with substantive involvement from government.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


PDI-11 Existence of a monitorable performance assessment framework (rating)

Transparent and monitorable performance assessment frameworks to assess progress against (a) national development strategies and (b) sector programmes.  Categorical where "A" assigned a value of 1; "B" assigned a value of 2; "C" assigned a value of 3; "D" assigned a value of 4; "E" assigned a value of 5; and "N/A" assigned a value of 6.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


PDI-12 Existence of a mutual accountability review (rating)

The concept of mutual accountability is an important innovation of the Paris Declaration.  It develops the idea that aid is more effective when both donors and partner governments are accountable to their respective publics for the use of resources to achieve development results, and when they are also accountable to each other. The specific focus of the agreed indicator (Indicator 12) is on mutual accountability for the implementation of the Partnership Commitments included in the Declaration and any local agreements on enhancing aid effectiveness. Specifically, the country survey returns tell us whether there exists a mechanism for mutual review of progress on aid


PDI-2a Country financial management systems reliability (rating)

This rating is the World Bank's annual Country Policy and Institutional Assessment ratings (CPIA sub-component 13) for the quality of budgetary and financial management.  This scale runs from 1 to 5 with 1 the worst and 5 the best.  The focus is on the degree to which existing systems adhere to broadly accepted good practices or there is a reform programme in place to promote improved practices.


PDI-2b Country procurement systems reliability (rating)

The focus is on the degree to which existing systems adhere to broadly accepted good practices or there is a reform programme in place to promote improved practices. Reliable procurement systems are based on the common benchmarking and assessment methodology for public procurement systems developed and piloted by the Joint Venture on Procurement.  Categorical where "A" assigned a value of 1; "B" assigned a value of 2; "C" assigned a value of 3; "D" assigned a value of 4; "E" assigned a value of 5; and "N/A" assigned a value of 6.


PDI-3 Government budget estimates comprehensive and realistic (percent)

The objective of this indicator is to improve transparency and accountability by encouraging partner countries and donors to accurately record aid as much as possible in the national budget, thereby allowing scrutiny by parliaments.  Aid flows to the government sector that is reported in country's national government budgets.


PDI-4 Technical assistance aligned and co-ordinated with country programmes (percent)

Donor capacity-development support provided through co-ordinated programmes are consistent with country's development strategies.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


PDI-5a Aid for government sectors uses country public finanacial management systems (percent)

Donors and aid flows that use country's public financial management systems that either (a) adhere to broadly good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


PDI-5b Aid for government sectors uses country procurement systems (percent)

Donors and aid flows that use country's procurement systems that either (a) adhere to broadly good practices or (b) have a reform programme in place to achieve these.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


PDI-6 Project implementation units parallel to country structures (number)

Indicator 6 is a count of parallel project implementation units (PIUs), where


PDI-7 Aid disbursements on schedule and recorded by government (percent)

Aid disbursements on schedule and recorded by government.  The objective is two-fold.  First and foremost, it is to encourage disbursements of funds within the year they are scheduled.  Second, it is to encourage accurate recording of disbursements by partner authorities.  Both objectives require strong cooperation between donors and partner authorities. Aid is more predictable and released according to agreed schedules in annual or multi-year frameworks.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


PDI-8 Bilateral aid that is untied (percent)

Tied aid is aid provided on the condition that the recipient uses it to purchase goods and services from suppliers based in the donor country. The target for this indicator is to increase untied aid over time.


PDI-9 Aid provided in the framework of programme-based appproaches (%)

Aid provided in the framework of programme-based approaches (PBAs) are a way of engaging in development co-operation based on the principles of co-ordinated support for  a locally owned programme of development, such as a national development strategy, a sector programme, a thematic programme or a programme of a specific organization.  Programme-based approaches share the following features: (i) Leadership by the host country or organization; (ii) A single comprehensive programme and budget framework; (iii) A formalized process for donor co-ordination and harmonization of donor procedures for reporting, budgeting, financial management and procurement; (iv) Efforts to increase the use of local systems for programme design and implementation, financial management, monitoring and evaluation.  Indicators 3 to 12 (but not Indictor 8) are drawn from the Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration for each respective year.


Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Estimate

Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.

Detailed documentation of the WGI, interactive tools for exploring the data, and full access to the underlying source data available at www.govindicators.org. The WGI are produced by Daniel Kaufmann (Natural Resource Governance Institute and Brookings Institution) and Aart Kraay (World Bank Development Research Group).  Please cite Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay and Massimo Mastruzzi (2010).  "The Worldwide Governance Indicators:  Methodology and Analytical Issues".  World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1682130).  The WGI do not reflect the official views of the Natural Resource Governance Institute, the Brookings Institution, the World Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they represent.


Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Number of Sources

Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism.   Number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the aggregate estimate is based.


Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Percentile Rank

Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism.  Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.


Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Percentile Rank, Lower Bound of 90% Confidence Interval

Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism.  Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.  Percentile Rank Lower refers to lower bound of 90 percent confidence interval for governance, expressed in percentile rank terms.


Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Percentile Rank, Upper Bound of 90% Confidence Interval

Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism.  Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.  Percentile Rank Upper refers to upper bound of 90 percent confidence interval for governance, expressed in percentile rank terms.


Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism: Standard Error

Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism.  Standard error indicates the precision of the estimate of governance.  Larger values of the standard error indicate less precise estimates.  A 90 percent confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.


Manufactures value index

Manufactures unit value index is a weighted unit value index of exports of manufactures by industrial countries.


Manufactured exports unit value (MUV) index (% change)

Manufactures unit value index (percentage change) is calculated as the annual percentage change of a weighted unit value index of exports of manufactures by industrial countries.


Real effective exchange rate index (line rec, 2005 = 100)

Real effective exchange rate is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a currency against a weighted average of several foreign currencies) divided by a price deflator or index of costs. This indicator corresponds to the IFS's line rec, and is based on a nominal rate adjusted for relative changes in consumer prices.

International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics.


Real effective exchange rate index (2010 = 100)

Real effective exchange rate is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a currency against a weighted average of several foreign currencies) divided by a price deflator or index of costs.


26_Portfolio investment assets

The data on reported portfolio investment assets (equity and debt securities) are sourced from the IMF’s Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey (CPIS) database.


24_International reserves (excluding gold)

The data on international reserve assets refer to entries published in the world tables of the IMF’s International Financial Statistics (IFS).


07_Multilateral loans, IMF

The data cover total outstanding loans and other liabilities to the IMF as at the end of the reference period. Outstanding IMF credit and loans outstanding—representing the sum of (1) the use of IMF credit within the General Resources Account, (2) outstanding loans under the Structural Adjustment Facility (SAF), the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) and the Trust Fund, and (3) arrears of interest (if applicable). The data are sourced from IMF records. Data on total IMF credit and loans are also disseminated in the IMF’s statistical publication, International Financial Statistics.


13_Multilateral loans, IMF, short term

The data cover total IMF credit and loan obligations (principal and interest) falling due in the next twelve months and the obligations that are in arrears as at the end of the reporting period. The data are denominated in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) and are converted to US dollars using the end-period exchange rate. The data are sourced from IMF records.


11_SDR allocation

SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF and allocated to members to supplement existing official reserves. Holdings of SDRs by an IMF member are recorded as an asset, while the allocation of SDRs is recorded as the incurrence of a liability of the member receiving them. The membership of the SDR Department incurs the asset and liability position among themselves, not with the IMF. The holdings and allocations should be shown gross, rather than netted (Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, sixth edition (BPM6)).


14_Debt securities held by nonresidents

The data are sourced from the IMF’s Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey (CPIS) database. Individual economy data on debt securities held by nonresidents are derived from other economies’ CPIS creditor data. The relevant tables in the CPIS database are 1) derived portfolio investment liabilities: long-term debt securities; and 2) derived portfolio investment liabilities: short-term debt securities.


15_Debt securities held by nonresidents, total, short term

Short-term debt securities cover such instruments as treasury bills, commercial paper, and bankers' acceptances that usually give the holder the unconditional right to a stated fixed sum of money on a specified date. These instruments are usually traded on organized markets at a discount and have an original term to maturity of one year or less.


25_SDR holdings

Holdings of SDRs are international reserve assets created by the IMF to supplement existing reserves. They are valued on the basis of a basket of currencies of four key international currencies and can be used in a wide variety of transactions and operations among official holders. SDRs are allocated to Fund members that are participants in the Fund’s Operations Division for SDRs and Administered Accounts in proportion to their quotas. Data  are sourced from IMF records.


08_Multilateral loans, other institutions

The data are sourced from the African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and Inter-American Development, and IBRD loans and IDA credits from the World Bank.

African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, Inter-American Development, World Bank


06_Multilateral loans, total

The data represent the sum of loans from the IMF (item 07) and other institutions (item 08).

African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, Inter-American Development, IMF, World Bank


04_Official bilateral loans, aid loans

Aid loans cover Official Development Assistance (ODA) loans. ODA loans are concessional loans provided by the official sector to countries and territories on the DAC List of ODA Recipients.


05_Official bilateral loans, other

Other loans cover official loans other than export credits that do not qualify as ODA, either as they are not for developmental purposes or are insufficiently concessional. Those DAC Members that provide loans, and so hold official debt, notify data on outstanding amounts on these loans to OECD annually under the Creditor Reporting System.


03_Official bilateral loans, total

The data show the outstanding debt on loans, other than direct export credits, extended by governments which are members of the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC). In addition to straightforward loans, official bilateral loans include loans repayable in kind, and eligible loans in Associated Financing packages.


23_Liabilities to BIS banks, consolidated, total

The data provides total international liabilities (all instruments) to banks that report the BIS Consolidated Banking Statistics.


12_Liabilities to BIS banks (cons.), short term

The data are derived from the BIS Consolidated Banking Statistics (CBS), which comprise data on gross consolidated claims of banks resident in the CBS reporting.


22_Liabilities to BIS banks, locational, total

The data provides total cross-border liabilities (all instruments) to banks that report the BIS Locational Banking Statistics.


01_Cross-border loans from BIS reporting banks

The data are derived from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Locational Banking Statistics.


02_Cross-border loans from BIS banks to nonbanks


27_Cross-border deposits with BIS rep. banks

The data are derived from the BIS locational banking statistics. Deposits with BIS reporting banks are shown in BIS publications as banks' liabilities to their creditors.


28_Cross-border dep. with BIS banks,  nonbanks


16_International debt securities, all maturities

The data are derived from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) International Debt Securities Statistics.


17_International debt securities, nonbanks

The data are derived from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) International Debt Securities Statistics, excluding bank issuers.


18_International debt securities, short term

The data are derived from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) International Debt Securities Statistics and cover securities with original maturity of up to 12 months.


19_Intnl debt securities, nonbanks, short term

The data are derived from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) International Debt Securities Statistics and cover securities with original maturity of up to 12 months, excluding bank issuers.


21_Paris Club claims (non ODA)

Amounts due to Paris Club Creditor Countries by foreign sovereign and other public debtors.


09_Insured export credit exposures, Berne Union

Data refer to Berne Union members’ direct insurance or lending, i.e. amount reinsured by others are not deducted and amounts reinsured by members for others are not added. Countries are defined  based on ISO 3166-1. Amounts guaranteed by an international financial institution are allocated to that institution, not the country of residence of the borrower or guarantor. Data are stock data, i.e. total outstanding amounts at the end of each quarter (31 March, 30 June, 30 September, and 31 December). Total data include medium/long-term (MLT) exposures and short-term (ST) exposures.


10_Insured export credit exposures, short term (BU)

ST refers to insured export credits with credit terms up to and including 12 months, except for transactions involving an insured manufacturing (pre-credit) risk with a risk period of more than 12 months, which are classified as medium/long-term  (MLT).


Real Effective Exchange Rate

Real effective exchange rate is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a currency against a weighted average of several foreign currencies) divided by a price deflator or index of costs.

World Bank staff calculations based on Datastream and IMF International Finance Statistics data.


Outstanding Deposits of Commercial Banks owned by Regional Government (Province Level, in IDR Million)

Indonesia Database for Policy and Economic Research

Bank Indonesia, Commercial Bank Monthly Report


Resolving insolvency: Commencement of proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)

The commencement of proceedings index has three components: (i) whether debtors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; (ii) whether creditors can initiate both liquidation and reorganization proceedings; and (iii) what standard is used for commencement of insolvency proceedings.


Resolving insolvency: Cost (% of estate)

The cost to resolve insolvency is the cost of the proceedings is recorded as a percentage of the value of the debtor’s estate, including court fees and government levies, fees of insolvency administrators, auctioneers, assessors and lawyers, and all other fees and costs.


Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology)

The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.


Resolving insolvency - Score

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.


Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar) - Score

The score for recovery rate benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.


Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.


Resolving insolvency: Outcome (0 as piecemeal sale and 1 as going concern)

Outcome records whether the case study company emerges from the proceedings as a going concern (1) or its assets are sold piecemeal (0). If the business continues operating, 100% of the company value is preserved. If the assets are sold piecemeal, the maximum amount that can be recovered is 70% of the value of the company.


Resolving insolvency: Recovery rate (cents on the dollar)

The recovery rate is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through judicial reorganization, liquidation or debt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings. The calculation takes into account the outcome: whether the business emerges from the proceedings as a going concern or the assets are sold piecemeal.


Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score

The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.


Rank: Resolving insolvency (1=most business-friendly regulations)

The ranking of economies on the ease of resolving insolvency is determined by sorting their scores for resolving insolvency.


Reorganization proceedings index (0-3) (DB15-20 methodology)

The reorganization proceedings index has three components: (i) whether the reorganization plan is voted on only by the creditors whose rights are modified or affected by the plan; (ii) whether creditors entitled to vote on the plan are divided into classes, each class votes separately and the creditors within each class are treated equally; and (iii) whether the insolvency framework requires that dissenting creditors receive as much under the reorganization plan as they would have received in liquidation.


Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)

The strength of insolvency framework index measures the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings and the extent to which best insolvency practices have been implemented in each economy covered by the Doing Business. This index ranges has four components, the commencement of proceedings index, management of debtor’s assets index, reorganization proceedings index and creditor participation index.


Total Special Allocation Grant/DAK (in IDR)

The Specific Allocation Grant (DAK) is a fund sourced from revenue in the Central Budget (APBN) allocated to a certain region with the aim of funding special activities of the region in accordance with national priorities. The DAK allocation has a formula component that takes into account the fiscal gap and has a 10 percent matching requirement. The DAK is earmarked for capital spending and cannot be used for research, training, administration, or official travel.

Ministry of Finance, SIKD (Information System for Sub-National Budget) and LKPP (Central Government Financial Report)


Total General Allocation Grant/DAU (in IDR)

The General Allocation Grant (DAU) is a fund sourced from the Central Budget (APBN) allocated to bring equality in the financial capacity among the regions to finance the need of the regions in implementation of decentralization. It is a discretionary block grant designed to equalize the fiscal capacities of sub-national governments. DAU is allocated based on a national formula and is the sum of a basic allocation (which is a portion of the sub-national budget spending on public servant salaries) and the “fiscal gap” of the sub-national government. The “fiscal gap” is the difference between the estimated fiscal needs and fiscal capacity of each region. Fiscal needs are based on regional variables such as population, area, GDP per capita, and human development index. Fiscal capacity is measured by a region’s own-source revenue and a fraction of total revenue-sharing.


Total Natural Resource Revenue Sharing/DBH SDA (in IDR)

The Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) is a vertical equalization grant, which shares tax and natural resource revenues with all districts with a larger proportion of revenues going to resource-rich districts where the revenues originated. DBH consists of revenue sharing from natural resources (DBH SDA) and taxes (DBH Pajak). DBH SDA comes from fuel, natural gas and geothermal, mining, forestry and fishery.

Ministry of Finance, SIKD (Information System for Sub-National Budget)


Total Revenue Sharing

The Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) is a vertical equalization grant, which shares tax, natural resource, and tobacco excise revenues with all districts with a larger proportion of revenues going to resource-rich districts where the revenues originated. DBH consists of revenue sharing from natural resources, taxes, and tobacco excise.


Total Tax Revenue Sharing/DBH Pajak (in IDR)

The Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH) is a vertical equalization grant, which shares tax and natural resource revenues with all districts with a larger proportion of revenues going to resource-rich districts where the revenues originated. DBH consists of revenue sharing from natural resources and taxes. DBH Pajak come mainly from property tax , acquisition tax of land and buildings and income tax.


Rule of Law: Estimate

Rule of Law captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.


Rule of Law: Number of Sources

Rule of Law captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. Number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the aggregate estimate is based.


Rule of Law: Percentile Rank

Rule of Law captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.


Rule of Law: Percentile Rank, Lower Bound of 90% Confidence Interval

Rule of Law captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.  Percentile Rank Lower refers to lower bound of 90 percent confidence interval for governance, expressed in percentile rank terms.


Rule of Law: Percentile Rank, Upper Bound of 90% Confidence Interval

Rule of Law captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.    Percentile Rank Upper refers to upper bound of 90 percent confidence interval for governance, expressed in percentile rank terms.


Rule of Law: Standard Error

Rule of Law captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. Standard error indicates the precision of the estimate of governance.  Larger values of the standard error indicate less precise estimates.  A 90 percent confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.


Length of District Road: Asphalt (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)

BADAN PUSAT STATISTIK - Statistics Indonesia


Length of District Road: Bad Damage (in km) (Bina Marga Data)

Ministry of Public Works, Directorate General of Highways (Bina Marga) Statistics


Length of District Road: Bad Damage (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of District Road: Dirt (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of District Road: Fair (in km) (Bina Marga Data)


Length of District Road: Fair (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of District Road: Good (in km) (Bina Marga Data)


Length of District Road: Good (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of District Road: Gravel (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of District Road: Light Damage (in km) (Bina Marga Data)


Length of District Road: Light Damage (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of District Road: Other (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Asphalt (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Bad Damage (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Dirt (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Fair (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Good (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Gravel (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Light Damage (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of National Road: Other (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Asphalt (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Bad Damage (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Dirt (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Fair (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Good (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Gravel (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Light Damage (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Length of Province Road: Other (in km) (BPS Data, Province only)


Villages with road: Asphalt (in % of total villages)

BADAN PUSAT STATISTIK - Statistics Indonesia, Village Census (PODES)


Villages with road: Dirt (in % of total villages)


Villages with road: Gravel (in % of total villages)


Villages with road: Other (in % of total villages)


Regulatory Quality: Estimate

Regulatory Quality captures perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.


Regulatory Quality: Number of Sources

Regulatory Quality captures perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development. umber of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the aggregate estimate is based.


Regulatory Quality: Percentile Rank

Regulatory Quality captures perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development. Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.


Regulatory Quality: Percentile Rank, Lower Bound of 90% Confidence Interval

Regulatory Quality captures perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development. Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.  Percentile Rank Lower refers to lower bound of 90 percent confidence interval for governance, expressed in percentile rank terms.


Regulatory Quality: Percentile Rank, Upper Bound of 90% Confidence Interval

Regulatory Quality captures perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development. Percentile rank indicates the country's rank among all countries covered by the aggregate indicator, with 0 corresponding to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.  Percentile ranks have been adjusted to correct for changes over time in the composition of the countries covered by the WGI.  Percentile Rank Upper refers to upper bound of 90 percent confidence interval for governance, expressed in percentile rank terms.


Regulatory Quality: Standard Error

Regulatory Quality captures perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development. Standard error indicates the precision of the estimate of governance.  Larger values of the standard error indicate less precise estimates.  A 90 percent confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.


Insurance policy holders per 1,000 adults (life)

Denotes the total number of life insurance policy holders (resident) that are resident nonfinancial corporations (public and private) and households for every 1,000 adults in the reporting country. Calculated as (number of life insurance policy holders)*1

International Monetary Fund, Financial Access Survey.


Insurance policy holders per 1,000 adults (non-life)

Denotes the total number of non-life insurance policy holders (resident) that are resident nonfinancial corporations (public and private) and households for every 1,000 adults in the reporting country. Calculated as (number of non-life insurance policy ho


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 1: Enabling Environment

Data Interpretation: 1=Latent; 2=Emerging; 3=Established; 4=Advanced. For additional information, visit the SABER: (website: http://saber.worldbank.org/index.cfm

Systems Approach for Better Education Results (SABER), World Bank


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 1 Lever 1: Legal Framework


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 1 Lever 2: Organizational Structure


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 1 Lever 3: Human Resources


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 1 Lever 4: Infrastructural capacity


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 1 Lever 5: Budget


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 1 Lever 6: Data-driven Culture


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 2: System Soundness


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 2 Lever 1: Data Architecture


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 2 Lever 2: Data Coverage


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 2 Lever 3: Data Analytics


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 2 Lever 4: Dynamic System


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 2 Lever 5: Serviceability


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 3: Quality data


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 3 Lever 1: Methodological Soundness


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 3 Lever 2: Accuracy and Reliability


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 3 Lever 3: Integrity


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 3 Lever 4: Periodicity and Timeliness


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 4: Utilization in decision making


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 4 Lever 1: Openness


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 4 Lever 2: Operational Use


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 4 Lever 3: Accessibility


SABER: (Education Management Information Systems) Policy Goal 4 Lever 4: Effectiveness in Disseminating Findings


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 1: Establishing an Enabling Environment


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 1 Lever 1: Legal Framework


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 1 Lever 2: Inter-sectoral Coordination


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 1 Lever 3: Finance


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 2: Implementing Widely


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 2 Lever 1: Scope of Programs


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 2 Lever 2: Coverage


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 2 Lever 3: Equity


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 3: Monitoring and Assuring Quality


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 3 Lever 1: Data Availability


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 3 Lever 2: Quality Standards


SABER: (Early Childhood Development) Policy Goal 3 Lever 3: Compliance with Standards


SABER: (Engaging the Private Sector, Government funded) Policy Goal 5: Encouraging innovation by providers


SABER: (Engaging the Private Sector, Government funded) Policy Goal 5 Lever 1: Teacher standards


SABER: (Engaging the Private Sector, Government funded) Policy Goal 5 Lever 2: Appointment and deployment of teachers